Almost every prop firm sells the same thing: a trading challenge with a fee. That makes the marketing easy to describe and hard to do well. Ad platforms restrict trading offers, traders ask hard questions about payouts, and affiliates need clear rules.
This page covers what we do for prop firms, what it costs, the one case we can share, and the math we use to judge every campaign.
What a prop firm marketing agency does
The job is to find traders who will buy a challenge, get them to checkout at the lowest cost, and keep them buying after they pass or fail. At Ranxy that means six kinds of work.
- Paid ads management for prop firms on Google, Meta, YouTube and the trading sites that accept prop firm ads, with copy written to pass each platform’s finance rules.
- Landing pages and checkout flows built around the challenge and tested one change at a time.
- SEO for the searches traders make before they buy, such as firm reviews, rule comparisons and payout questions.
- AI search work, so ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google’s AI answers find clear, consistent facts about your firm.
- Affiliate and IB programs, including the terms, the tracking, partner recruitment and checks on partner sales.
- Tracking and reporting that ties each dollar to a challenge sold, not to a click or a sign-up.
You can hire us for one of these or for all six. If you want an all-in-one marketing solution for your prop firm, that is our Scale plan. It puts paid ads, landing pages, SEO, affiliates and tracking with one team and one report. One team means one set of numbers.
Who we work with
We work only with financial brands, and prop firms are one of our core markets. We work with prop firms at three stages.
- New firms launching their first challenge, where tracking and the first ad channel come first.
- Growing firms adding a second channel, a new market or an affiliate program.
- Futures, CFD and crypto prop firms, which each face different platform rules.
Prop firm marketing services and prices
Plans run from $2,500 to $25,000 and up a month, plus your ad spend, which you pay to the platforms yourself.
| Plan | Price a month | Good fit for | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $2,500 | One focused service |
|
| Launch | $4,500 | New firms on one ad channel |
|
| Growth | $7,500 | Adding a second ad channel |
|
| Scale | $14,500 | All-in-one growth |
|
| Enterprise | From $25,000 | Large firms in several markets |
|
Above the included spend, a media fee of 6% to 8% applies, depending on the plan. A paid deep audit costs $2,500. It is credited in full against your first three months if you sign within 60 days. Every line item is on our pricing page.
Proof: a prop firm launched from zero
Case study
This prop firm came to us with no paid pipeline. We built and ran its acquisition from launch, including campaigns, budgets, bids, fraud checks and tracking. We framed the offer to stay inside platform policy. The firm is not named, by agreement.
Results vary and are not guaranteed.
It is the one prop firm case we can publish today. When more clients agree to share numbers, we will add them here with dates and method.
The number that matters: cost per challenge sold
Most agencies report cost per lead. For a prop firm that hides what matters, because a lead is an email address and a challenge is a sale. We report cost per challenge sold, which is your ad and partner spend divided by the challenges it sold.
Cost per challenge sold = ad spend + partner commissionschallenges sold
Here is the math with round numbers. Say a $100,000 challenge sells for $500 and your ads cost $2 a click. If 2% of visitors buy, you need 50 clicks for one sale, so each sale costs $100 in ads. That is 20% of the price.
| Visitors who buy | Clicks per sale | Ad cost per challenge sold | Share of a $500 challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | 50 | $100 | 20% |
| 3% | 33 | $67 | 13% |
| 4% | 25 | $50 | 10% |
An illustration with round numbers, not client data.
The ads did not change in that table. The landing page and checkout did the work. That is why we test pages before we raise budgets.
The second half of the math is the repeat sale. Traders often buy another challenge after a failed attempt. If 40% of buyers come back for a second one, each first sale is worth $700, not $500, and you can afford to pay more for it. So we track the repeat rate by channel. The channel with the cheapest first sale is not always the one that brings traders who buy again.
We do not use cost per funded account as the main number. Whether a trader passes depends on their trading, not on your ads.
Where prop firms can advertise in 2026
Google and Meta both handle trading offers with care, and neither writes its rules for prop firms in one place.
Google’s financial services policy does not name prop firms or trading challenges. We checked on 11 November 2026. Ads that talk about trading and payouts can still be reviewed under it. Google is also widening its checks on financial advertisers. In June 2026 it said its verification for financial advertisers would cover every EU and EEA country. It is adding 24 countries in phases, and advertisers who do not verify will have their financial ads restricted. In October 2026 it announced a similar rule for the US and Canada. From early 2027, advertisers there will need to show they are authorized by a regulator or a recognized registry before running certain financial ads.
Meta is harder to predict. In June 2026, TradeInformer reported that Meta had removed the ad accounts or pages of several prop firms, with no clear pattern.
So we plan for rejections. We write ad copy to pass review before it runs and keep at least two channels live, so one disapproval does not stop sales. We also build channels no platform can switch off, such as search, email and affiliates. Our Trading Ads Rulebook covers the rules platform by platform, and our guide to why financial ads get disapproved covers the usual causes.
Payout trust and the claims you can make
Traders buy from firms they believe will pay. That is the whole sale. So your site has to answer the payout question before a trader asks it. Pages that build that trust usually show these things.
- The payout schedule and method, with the date the page was last checked.
- Recent payouts your team can document.
- The rules that decide a pass or a breach, in plain words.
- Every fee, refund and reset in one table.
- Who owns the firm, where it is registered and how to raise a dispute.
What your marketing cannot do is promise funding or profit. Regulators have warned about this since 2024. Belgium’s FSMA called prop trading a “shadow investment game” in a March 2024 warning. Italy’s CONSOB warned about trading challenges in July 2024. In June 2024 the Czech National Bank said some prop models may fall under MiFID, the EU law for investment services. In March 2026, TradeInformer reported that FTMO had moved away from “funded account” wording in its terms.
We write around those words. Claims stay limited to what the firm can show, and your compliance team signs off on them.
The same pages help in AI search. When a trader asks an AI assistant which prop firm to trust, the answer leans on facts it can find and check across the web. Clear, dated payout and rule pages give it something accurate to quote.
Affiliate marketing services for prop firms
Traders, educators and trading communities can sell challenges well, because their audiences already trade. A partner program works when four things are in place.
- Clear terms, with commission on the second and third challenge as well as the first.
- Tracking that holds up when partners change links, codes or platforms.
- Fraud checks for self-referrals, leaked coupon codes and chargebacks.
- Rules for what partners may say, with no promises of funding or profit.
We set up the program, recruit the first partners and run it as its own channel, with its own cost per challenge sold. Partner payouts go through your accounts, so the audit trail stays with you. Affiliate and IB program setup and management is part of Scale and our larger plans.
SEO and AI search for prop firms
Traders research before they pay. They search for firm reviews, rule comparisons, payout proof and whether a firm is legit. If your site does not answer those questions, a comparison site or a forum will.
We build the pages that answer them. Rules, fees, payouts and platforms each get a clear page that search engines and AI assistants can quote. SEO is included in Launch, Growth and Scale. Launch covers 10 priority keywords, Growth covers 25 and Scale covers 50. If you only want SEO, Starter covers it as a single service for $2,500 a month. AI search work is included in every package, and our guide on how financial brands get cited in AI search explains the method.
How we start with a prop firm
- Free audit. Send us your site and the basics of your setup. Within two business days you get the three fixes we would make first, in writing.
- Plan and tracking. We agree on the plan, set up tracking to the challenge sold and fix the leaks the audit found.
- Launch and test. Ads, pages and partner offers go live one test at a time, with a compliance review before launch.
- Scale what works. Budget moves to the channels with the lowest cost per challenge sold and the best repeat rate.
Most new clients start on Growth. It is the smallest plan with monthly compliance review and a 24-hour response to ad disapprovals. There is no minimum term. If you cannot point to three documented improvements in the first 30 days, we credit your second month in full.
Compare before you choose
If you are comparing agencies, our list of the best prop firm marketing agencies scores six agencies on the same checks. Ranxy publishes that list and ranks itself first, and we scored ourselves on the same checks as everyone else.
For the full method, channel by channel, read our prop firm marketing playbook. If you are still setting up, start with how to start a prop firm and our prop firm CRM checklist. Our glossary entry explains what a prop firm is.
Sources
- Google Ads, Financial products and services policy, checked 11 November 2026
- Google, Expanding financial advertiser verification across Europe, 23 June 2026
- Google, Financial services verification in the US and Canada, 20 October 2026
- TradeInformer, Meta is targeting prop firms, 5 June 2026
- FSMA, warning on prop trading, 7 March 2024
- ANSA, CONSOB warning on online trading challenges, 8 July 2024
- Finance Magnates, Czech National Bank on prop firms and MiFID, 6 June 2024
- TradeInformer, FTMO and funded account wording, 27 March 2026
B2B marketing commentary. Not investment advice, and not a recommendation to trade or to use any broker, exchange or prop firm.